231 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 1975), 2--57753, Sampson v. City of Cedar Falls

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 348 U.S. 483 (1955), 184, Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.
• California - 210 Cal. 625, S. F. 13341, Rice v. Hanrahan Co.
• Iowa - 2 Iowa 165 (Iowa. 1855), Santo v. State
• Iowa - 21 Iowa 540 (Iowa. 1866), Purczell v. Smidt
• Iowa - 115 N.W. 177 (Iowa 1908), Eckerson v. City of Des Moines



See all quotations

• Iowa - 261 N.W. 423 (Iowa 1935), 42809, Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Co. v. City of Villisca
• Iowa - 272 N.W. 624 (Iowa 1937), 43865, Brutsche v. Incorporated Town of Coon Rapids
• Iowa - 62 N.W. 772 (Iowa 1895), State ex rel. Witter v. Forkner
• Iowa - 8 N.W. 638 (Iowa 1881), City of Des Moines v. Hillis
• Iowa - 104 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa 1960), 50092, Summey v. City of Ames
• Iowa - 131 N.W.2d 5 (Iowa 1964), 51515, Green v. City of Mt. Pleasant
• Iowa - 142 N.W.2d 378 (Iowa 1966), 52097, Long v. Board of Sup'rs of Benton County
• Iowa - 162 N.W.2d 730 (Iowa 1968), 53132, Lee Enterprises, Inc. v. Iowa State Tax Commission
• Iowa - 165 N.W.2d 782 (Iowa 1969), 53344, Goergen v. State Tax Commission
• Iowa - 179 N.W.2d 508 (Iowa 1970), 53967, Maguire v. Fulton
• Iowa - 184 N.W.2d 29 (Iowa 1971), 54181, Stanley v. Southwestern Community College Merged Area (Merged Area XIV), in Counties of Adair, et al.
• Iowa - 197 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa 1972), 54815, Peel v. Burk
• Iowa - 217 N.W.2d 687 (Iowa 1974), 56364, Keasling v. Thompson
• Iowa - 218 N.W.2d 579 (Iowa 1974), 2--56305, State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery
• Iowa - 225 N.W.2d 326 (Iowa 1975), 2--57096, Bechtel v. City of Des Moines
• Iowa - 227 N.W.2d 192 (Iowa 1975), 57058, State v. Hall
• Iowa - 30 N.W.2d 500 (Iowa 1948), 47135, City of Des Moines v. City of West Des Moines
• Iowa - 35 N.W.2d 66 (Iowa 1948), 47072, Dickinson v. Porter
• Iowa - 88 N.W.2d 50 (Iowa 1958), 49367, Miehls v. City of Independence
• New Jersey - 212 A.2d 136 (N.J. 1965), A--45, Whelan v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.
• Washington - 479 P.2d 61 (Wash. 1971), 41579, Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish County v. Taxpayers and Ratepayers of Snohomish County
• Florida - 144 So. 397 (Fla. 1932), Escott v. City of Miami