231 Cal.App.2d 101, 28002, Frankenheimer v. Frankenheimer

Citation: 231 Cal.App.2d 101, 41 Cal.Rptr. 636

Opinion Judge: [10] Lillie

Party Name: Frankenheimer v. Frankenheimer

Attorney: [7] Zagon, Aaron & Schiff, Gunther H. Schiff and Arnold H. Dubrow for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Ely, Kadison & Quinn, Stuart L. Kadison, Gang, Tyre, Rudin & Brown, Martin Gang and Milton A. Rudin for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday December 08, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

231 Cal.App.2d 101, 28002, Frankenheimer v. Frankenheimer

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 117 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1941), 9575, Lovell v. Dulac Cypress Co.
California - 12 Cal.2d 598, 16885, Hamilton v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
California - 35 Cal.2d 16, 6023, Bonebrake v. McCormick
California - 39 Cal.2d 355, 22231, Mountain States Creamery Co. v. Tagerman
California - 46 Cal.2d 690, 23409, Primm v. Primm

See all quotations