230 Cal.App.3d 923, B047676, Carpenter v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 230 Cal.App.3d 923, 281 Cal.Rptr. 500

Opinion Judge: [10] Goertzen

Party Name: Carpenter v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Dewberry & Emmer and Howard A. Emmer for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] James K. Hahn, City Attorney, John T. Neville, Thomas C. Hokinson and Richard M. Helgeson, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: May 28, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

230 Cal.App.3d 923, B047676, Carpenter v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 69 Cal.2d 782, 29565, Johnson v. State
California - 70 Cal.2d 252, 29610, McCorkle v. City of Los Angeles
California - 17 Cal.3d 425, 23042, Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California
California - 27 Cal.3d 741, 24006, Thompson v. County of Alameda
California - 34 Cal.3d 18, 24343, Williams v. State of California

See all quotations