230 Cal.App.3d 454, A044561, Studley v. Benicia Unified Sch. Dist.

Citation: 230 Cal.App.3d 454, 281 Cal.Rptr. 631

Opinion Judge: [11] Newsom

Party Name: Studley v. Benicia Unified Sch. Dist.

Attorney: [7] Eisenberg & Pollack, Eisenberg, Axelrod & Highlander, Neil D. Eisenberg, Harry Pollack, Stephen R. Leopold, Lynn L. Axelrod, Judy E. Highlander and Eunice Calbert-Banks for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] No appearance for Defendants. [9] Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson and Orlie...

Case Date: Tuesday May 28, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

230 Cal.App.3d 454, A044561, Studley v. Benicia Unified Sch. Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 61 Cal.2d 638, 21371, Tomerlin v. Canadian Indem. Co.
California - 65 Cal.2d 263, 28897, Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co.
California - 10 Cal.3d 94, 7973, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Partridge
California - 22 Cal.3d 865, 30759, Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.
California - 31 Cal.3d 147, 31439, Peterson v. Superior Court

See all quotations