230 Cal.App.2d 167, 28134, Mercer v. Lemmens

Citation: 230 Cal.App.2d 167, 40 Cal.Rptr. 803

Opinion Judge: [10] Burke

Party Name: Mercer v. Lemmens

Attorney: [7] Cadoo, Tretheway & McGinn and Jack W. Morgan for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Healy & Helm and Richard F. Healy for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Friday October 16, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

230 Cal.App.2d 167, 28134, Mercer v. Lemmens

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 116 Cal. 515, L. A. 201, Clark v. Yocum
California - 197 Cal. 43, Sac. 3627, Johnson v. Schimpf
California - 5 Cal.2d 511, 15503, Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & Sons
California - 53 Cal.App. 66, Civ. 3601, Shaw v. Union Escrow and Realty Company (A Corporation)
California - 110 Cal.App.2d 427, 18751, Pixley v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn.

See all quotations