229 Cal.App.2d 696, 28033, Burk v. Municipal Court of Whittier Judicial Dist., LosAngeles County

Citation: 229 Cal.App.2d 696, 40 Cal.Rptr. 425

Opinion Judge: [11] Burke

Party Name: Burk v. Municipal Court of Whittier Judicial Dist., LosAngeles County

Attorney: [7] Robert A. Von Esch, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Thomas W. Bewley, City Attorney, Martin E. Whelan, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, and Bewley, Knoop, Lassleben & Whelan for Real Party in Interest.

Case Date: September 15, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

229 Cal.App.2d 696, 28033, Burk v. Municipal Court of Whittier Judicial Dist., LosAngeles County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 138 F. 209 (N.D.Ill. 1905), 27,599, Glucose Refining Co. v. City of Chicago
Federal Cases - 274 U.S. 325 (1927), 196, Zahn v. Board of Public Works
California - 195 Cal. 477, L. A. 8012, Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
California - 33 Cal.2d 453, 20383, Lockard v. City of Los Angeles
California - 4 Cal.2d 60, 14127, Simpson v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations