228 Cal.App.2d 798, 21597, Allen v. Enomoto

Citation: 228 Cal.App.2d 798, 39 Cal.Rptr. 815

Opinion Judge: [10] Agee

Party Name: Allen v. Enomoto

Attorney: [7] Elton F. Martin for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants. [8] Truce & Veal, Harlan K. Veal and Johnson C. Montgomery for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday July 30, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

228 Cal.App.2d 798, 21597, Allen v. Enomoto

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 18 Cal.2d 798, 16620, Hatfield v. Levy Brothers
California - 37 Cal.2d 16, 21344, Freedman v. The Rector
California - 37 Cal.2d 544, 21857, Royer v. Carter
California - 56 Cal.2d 515, 26266, Caplan v. Schroeder
California - 177 Cal.App.2d 390, 24290, Wicktor v. Los Angeles County

See all quotations