228 Cal.App.2d 681, 27726, Philbrick v. Weinberger

Citation: 228 Cal.App.2d 681, 39 Cal.Rptr. 617

Opinion Judge: [10] Kingsley

Party Name: Philbrick v. Weinberger

Attorney: [7] Leo Shapiro for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Spray, Gould & Bowers, Joseph L. Spray, James Benson and Bernard A. Newell, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Monday July 27, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

228 Cal.App.2d 681, 27726, Philbrick v. Weinberger

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 199 Cal.App.2d 586, 19413, Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital Foundation
California - 213 Cal.App.2d 699, 26552, Orr v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority
California - 215 Cal.App.2d 419, 20344, Palmer v. Financial Indem. Co.
California - 221 Cal.App.2d 736, 27331, Kraus v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.
California - 51 Cal.App.2d 311, 13360, George v. City of Los Angeles