227 Cal.App.3d 795, DO11126, Uhler v. City of Encinitas

Citation: 227 Cal.App.3d 795, 278 Cal.Rptr. 157

Opinion Judge: [11] Wiener

Party Name: Uhler v. City of Encinitas

Attorney: [7] Bruce R. Babcock for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Mark A. Potter for Defendants and Respondents. [9] Georgiou & Tosdal, Byron S. Georgiou, Berlin & Albert and Michael D. Berlin as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: February 13, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

227 Cal.App.3d 795, DO11126, Uhler v. City of Encinitas

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 31 Cal.3d 545, 24239, Rumford v. City of Berkeley
California - 172 Cal.App.3d 151, E001138, Citizens Assn. for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of Inyo
California - 184 Cal.App.3d 180, D003018, Christward Ministry v. Superior Court
California - 189 Cal.App.3d 1040, B010297, Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance