227 Cal.App.2d 226, 21101, Benwell v. Dean

Citation: 227 Cal.App.2d 226, 38 Cal.Rptr. 542

Opinion Judge: [10] Taylor

Party Name: Benwell v. Dean

Attorney: [7] Berry, Davis, Lewis & McInerney and Samuel H. Berry for Defendant and Appellant. [8] J. Adrian Palmquist and Francis T. Cornish for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: May 15, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

227 Cal.App.2d 226, 21101, Benwell v. Dean

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 29 Cal.2d 581, 19502, Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School Dist.
California - 44 Cal.2d 225, 23300, Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.
California - 44 Cal.2d 325, 6531, Jensen v. Minard
California - 45 Cal.2d 183, 23492, Buckley v. Chadwick
California - 47 Cal.2d 729, 19552, Brandelius v. City & County of S. F.

See all quotations