226 Cal.App.3d 1128, AO45593, Urbaniak v. Newton

Citation: 226 Cal.App.3d 1128, 277 Cal.Rptr. 354

Opinion Judge: [10] Newsom

Party Name: Urbaniak v. Newton

Attorney: [7] Alice Philipson, Bien, Summers & Dale and E. Elizabeth Summers for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] O'Connor, Cohn, Dillon & Barr, Duncan Barr, Susan J. Reifel, Lynch, Loofbourrow, Helmenstine, Gilardi & Grummer, Robert T. Lynch and Daniel F. McLennon for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Monday January 14, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

226 Cal.App.3d 1128, AO45593, Urbaniak v. Newton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 381 U.S. 479 (1965), 496, Griswold v. Connecticut
Federal Cases - 389 U.S. 347 (1967), 35, Katz v. United States
California - 27 Cal.2d 859, 19456, Consolidated Etc. Corp. v. United A. Etc. Workers
California - 1 Cal.3d 80, 12806, People v. Bradley
California - 13 Cal.3d 757, 30348, White v. Davis

See all quotations