226 Cal.App.2d 309, 27824, Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission

Citation: 226 Cal.App.2d 309, 38 Cal.Rptr. 57

Opinion Judge: [11] Ford

Party Name: Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission

Attorney: [7] Lawler, Felix & Hall, Kenneth B. Wright and Douglas Van Dyke for Petitioner. [8] E. Herbert Herlihy and F. George Herlihy as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner. [9] Everett A. Corten, Edward A. Sarkisian, Silver, McWilliams & Sherman and Richard L. McWilliams for Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday April 14, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

226 Cal.App.2d 309, 27824, Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 130 F.2d 965 (8th Cir. 1942), 12275, Standard Oil Co. v. Lyons
Arizona - 350 P.2d 659 (Ariz. 1960), 6660, Posey v. Industrial Commission
California - 1 Cal.2d 370, 14879, Davis v. Jacoby
California - 21 Cal.2d 273, 16766, Sublett v. Henry's Etc. Lunch
California - 21 Cal.2d 461, 18419, Cal. Casualty Indemnity Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

See all quotations