225 Cal.App.3d 107, A048658, Pacific Bell v. California State & Consumer Services Agency

Citation: 225 Cal.App.3d 107, 275 Cal.Rptr. 62

Opinion Judge: [11] Strankman

Party Name: Pacific Bell v. California State & Consumer Services Agency

Attorney: [7] Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, C. Douglas Floyd, Ronald E. Van Buskirk, Pauline Fox, Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, William T. Bagley and Jose E. Guzman, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Floyd D. Shimomura and Daniel G. Stone, Dep...

Case Date: Thursday November 15, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

225 Cal.App.3d 107, A048658, Pacific Bell v. California State & Consumer Services Agency

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 1 Cal.2d 739, 15050, Landsborough v. Kelly
California - 13 Cal.3d 303, 23053, Carmona v. Division of Industrial Safety
California - 13 Cal.3d 733, 23244, Anderson v. Phillips
California - 16 Cal.3d 583, 23262, In re Marriage of Bouquet
California - 17 Cal.3d 859, 30406, Loder v. Municipal Court

See all quotations