224 Cal.App.2d 262, 26634, Poulsen v. Charlton

Citation: 224 Cal.App.2d 262, 36 Cal.Rptr. 347

Opinion Judge: [10] Shinn

Party Name: Poulsen v. Charlton

Attorney: [7] Aidlin, Martin & Mamakos and Bonnie Lee Martin for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Johnson & Johnson, George R. Johnson, Spray, Gould & Bowers, Daniel O. Howard and Cushman & Grover for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday January 22, 1964

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

224 Cal.App.2d 262, 26634, Poulsen v. Charlton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 175 Cal. 464, L. A. 3990, Nolen v. F. O. Engstrum Co.
California - 24 Cal.2d 114, 18832, Columbia Lab., Inc. v. Cal. Beauty Etc. Co.
California - 25 Cal.2d 237, 19068, Donahoo v. Kress House Moving Corp.
California - 25 Cal.2d 486, 19067, Ybarra v. Spangard
California - 39 Cal.2d 436, 18456, Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

See all quotations