221 Cal.App.3d 114, D009272, Division of Lab. Stds. Enforcement v. Ericsson Information Systems, Inc.

Citation: 221 Cal.App.3d 114, 270 Cal.Rptr. 75

Opinion Judge: [11] Work

Party Name: Division of Lab. Stds. Enforcement v. Ericsson Information Systems, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Stuart M. Kaye for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, William D. Claster, J. Kevin Lilly, Palecek, Nolta & Scakall, Palacek & Nolta and Franklin L. Nolta for Defendants and Respondents. [9] Stephen P. Morrell, James E. Holst and George L. Marchand as Amici Curiae on behalf ...

Case Date: May 22, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

221 Cal.App.3d 114, D009272, Division of Lab. Stds. Enforcement v. Ericsson Information Systems, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 215 Cal. 384, L. A. 13311, City of Pasadena v. Charleville
California - 71 Cal.2d 566, 29602, Purdy and Fitzpatrick v. State
California - 1 Cal.3d 56, 22677, Bishop v. City of San Jose
California - 22 Cal.3d 198, 23688, Armistead v. State Personnel Board
California - 23 Cal.3d 296, 23892, Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of Sonoma

See all quotations