221 Cal.App.2d 460, 20703, Ehman v. Moore

Citation: 221 Cal.App.2d 460, 34 Cal.Rptr. 540

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Ehman v. Moore

Attorney: [7] Louis C. Moore, in pro. per., Hudson, Martin, Ferrante & Street and Peter J. Coniglio for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel and Charles H. Page for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: October 23, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

221 Cal.App.2d 460, 20703, Ehman v. Moore

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 131 Cal.App.2d 498, 20310, Chenoweth v. Office of City Clerk
California - 151 Cal.App.2d 589, 22097, Altman v. Poole
California - 163 Cal.App.2d 319, 22937, Guardianship of Blair
California - 173 Cal.App.2d 613, 18370, Datta v. Staab
California - 182 Cal.App.2d 339, 24365, Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. v. Indermill

See all quotations