220 N.E.2d 348 (Ind.App. 1966), 20203, Barnett v. Bailey's Beautician Supply Co.
Linked as:
Extract
220 N.E.2d 348 (Ind.App. 1966), 20203, Barnett v. Bailey's Beautician Supply Co.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Indiana - 89 Ind. 453 (Ind. 1883), 9315, Pennsylvania Co. v. Roney
- Indiana - 78 N.E. 325 (Ind. 1906), 20,873, Indiana Union Traction Company v. Jacobs
- Indiana - 85 N.E. 969 (Ind. 1908), 20,975, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'Conner
- Indiana - 96 N.E. 815 (Ind.App. 1911), 7,337, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago And St. Louis Railway Company v. Dixon
- Indiana - 104 N.E.2d 669 (Ind. 1952), 28902, Pokraka v. Lummus Co.