220 Cal.App.3d 1212, B043764, Williams v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 220 Cal.App.3d 1212, 269 Cal.Rptr. 869

Opinion Judge: [10] George

Party Name: Williams v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Stone & Healy and Mary Ann Healy for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Frederick N. Merkin, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur B. Walsh, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: May 29, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

220 Cal.App.3d 1212, B043764, Williams v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 15 Cal.3d 194, 23241, Skelly v. State Personnel Bd.
California - 18 Cal.3d 395, 23457, Barber v. State Personnel Bd.
California - 34 Cal.3d 191, 24331, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City of Gridley
California - 40 Cal.3d 822, 32002, Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles
California - 47 Cal.3d 195, S005008, Williams v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations