220 Cal.App.2d 836, 10619, Zancaner v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

Citation: 220 Cal.App.2d 836, 34 Cal.Rptr. 143

Opinion Judge: [10] Schottky

Party Name: Zancaner v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

Attorney: [7] Hagar, Crosby & Rosson and Richard Logan for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Molinari, Casalnuovo & Berger and Joseph L. Casalnuovo for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: October 03, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

220 Cal.App.2d 836, 10619, Zancaner v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 257 F.2d 401 (8th Cir. 1958), 15945, Wabash Railroad Co. v. Hartog
California - 147 Cal. 536, S. F. 4231, Whitney v. Superior Court
California - 19 Cal.2d 553, 18055, Eagle Oil & Ref. Co. v. Prentice
California - 168 Cal.App.2d 110, 23185, Sunru Chang v. Carson Estate Co.
California - 75 Cal.App.2d 493, 7248, Yurkas v. Zampatti

See all quotations