220 A.2d 119 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1966), A--137, City of Perth Amboy v. Middlesex County Bd. of Taxation

Citation: 220 A.2d 119, 91 N.J.Super. 305

Opinion Judge: [11] Per Curiam

Party Name: CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, a municipal corporation, Township of Piscataway, a municipal corporation, and Township of Woodbridge, a municipal corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Leo Rosenblum argued the cause for appellants Township of Piscataway and City of Perth Amboy (Mr. Francis M. Seaman, attorney for City of Perth Amboy).

Case Date: Tuesday May 31, 1966

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

220 A.2d 119 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1966), A--137, City of Perth Amboy v. Middlesex County Bd. of Taxation

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 113 A.2d 753 (N.J. 1955), A-131, City of Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation
New Jersey - 173 A.2d 8 (N.J. 1961), A--137, Town of Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals in Dept. of Treasury
New Jersey - 219 A.2d 507 (N.J. 1966), A--120, Greenwich Tp. v. Gloucester County Bd. of Taxation
New Jersey - 89 A.2d 385 (N.J. 1952), A-121, Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of Newark