22 Cal.App.4th 22, E009342, Stoll v. Shuff

Citation: 22 Cal.App.4th 22, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 249

Opinion Judge: [10] Mckinster

Party Name: Stoll v. Shuff

Attorney: [7] Berger & Norton, Michael M. Berger and Jacqueline A. Axtell, for Defendants, Appellants and Cross-Respondents. [8] Gerhard Stoll, in pro. per., Law Offices of Jerome Sapiro, Jr., and David A. Sauers, for Plaintiff, Respondent and Cross-Appellant.

Case Date: January 28, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.4th 22, E009342, Stoll v. Shuff

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 872 F.2d 312 (9th Cir. 1989), 88-1561, Oki America, Inc. v. Microtech Intern., Inc.
California - 153 Cal. 578, S. F. 4427, Hibernia Savings and Loan Society v. Farnham
California - 36 Cal.3d 752, 31588, Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.
California - 162 Cal.App.3d 877, F000080, Quigley v. Pet, Inc.
California - 193 Cal.App.3d 530, H001189, Palmer v. Ted Stevens Honda, Inc.

See all quotations