22 Cal.App.4th 1553, B072854, Hanooka v. Pivko

Citation: 22 Cal.App.4th 1553, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 70

Opinion Judge: [10] Nott

Party Name: Hanooka v. Pivko

Attorney: [7] Kinsella, Boesch, Fujikawa & Towle, and Philip W. Boesch, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Hillsinger & Costanzo, Sarah Yoseloff and Jane O'Donnell; Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols and Keith Staub, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: March 01, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.4th 1553, B072854, Hanooka v. Pivko

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 2 Cal.3d 335, 29677, City of Ontario v. Superior Court
California - 38 Cal.3d 227, 24678, Elston v. City of Turlock
California - 39 Cal.3d 892, 31922, Gutierrez v. Mofid
California - 53 Cal.3d 315, S005969, Woods v. Young
California - 11 Cal.App.3d 613, 36117, Pearson v. Continental Airlines

See all quotations