22 Cal.App.3d 965, 37800, Stockton v. Rattner

Citation: 22 Cal.App.3d 965, 99 Cal.Rptr. 787

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaus

Party Name: Stockton v. Rattner

Attorney: [7] Goldberg & Franklin and M. Pearl Franklin for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant and for Cross-defendant and Appellant. [8] Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Richard S. Berger and Bernard P. Simons for Defendants and Respondents and for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday January 18, 1972

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.3d 965, 37800, Stockton v. Rattner

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 33 Cal.2d 116, 17746, Sjoberg v. Hastorf
California - 54 Cal.2d 784, 25860, Southern Pac. Co. v. Oppenheimer
California - 55 Cal.2d 403, 20579, Greene v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco
California - 27 Cal.App. 11, Civ. 1316, Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Figel
California - 8 Cal.App. 711, Civ. 562, California Fruit Growers' Association of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

See all quotations