22 Cal.App.3d 465, 10123, In re Bongfeldt

Citation: 22 Cal.App.3d 465, 99 Cal.Rptr. 428

Opinion Judge: [10] Elkington

Party Name: In re Bongfeldt

Attorney: [6] Walcom & Harmon and John T. Harmon for Petitioner. [7] No appearance for Respondent. [8] Fletcher, Smith & Lasky and Henry B. Lasky as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday December 28, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.3d 465, 10123, In re Bongfeldt

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 356 U.S. 677 (1958), 51, United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.
California - 14 Cal.2d 464, 16174, Bridges v. Superior Court
California - 38 Cal.2d 509, 21820, City of Vernon v. Superior Court
California - 50 Cal.2d 654, 24975, Comunale v. Traders & General Ins. Co.
California - 54 Cal.2d 548, 20432, Chronicle Pub. Co. v. Superior Court In and For City and County of San Francisco

See all quotations