22 Cal.App.3d 238, 38348, Richie v. Tate Motors, Inc.

Citation: 22 Cal.App.3d 238, 99 Cal.Rptr. 223

Opinion Judge: [10] Schweitzer

Party Name: Richie v. Tate Motors, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Scher & Cornblum and Bruce Cornblum for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Nichols, Stead, Boileau & Lamb and Curtis W. Morris for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday December 21, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.3d 238, 38348, Richie v. Tate Motors, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 19 Cal.2d 634, 18104, County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie
California - 53 Cal.2d 105, 25452, Stoddart v. Peirce
California - 177 Cal.App.2d 365, 18405, Borjesson v. Simpson
California - 195 Cal.App.2d 453, 25381, Meza v. Ralph
California - 247 Cal.App.2d 611, 7993, Uber v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.

See all quotations