219 Cal.App.3d 777, A048850, Sprowl v. Superior Court

Citation: 219 Cal.App.3d 777, 268 Cal.Rptr. 592

Opinion Judge: [11] Stein

Party Name: Sprowl v. Superior Court

Attorney: [7] Carlson & Husick for Petitioner. [8] No appearance for Respondent. [9] Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison and Thomas M. Peterson for Real Parties in Interest.

Case Date: April 17, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

219 Cal.App.3d 777, A048850, Sprowl v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 30 Cal.3d 762, 31435, Hartman v. Santamarina
California - 35 Cal.3d 772, 31796, Rhinehart v. Municipal Court
California - 36 Cal.3d 171, 31725, Palma v. U. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.
California - 136 Cal.App.3d 81, 65949, Rice v. Superior Court
California - 139 Cal.App.3d 108, 64684, Arreola v. Municipal Court

See all quotations