219 Cal.App.2d 144, 6991, Davis v. Ward

Citation: 219 Cal.App.2d 144, 32 Cal.Rptr. 796

Opinion Judge: [10] Coughlin

Party Name: Davis v. Ward

Attorney: [7] Casey, McClenahan & Christensen, George R. McClenahan and Walter P. Christensen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Oakes & Horton and Harry A. Horton for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday August 08, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

219 Cal.App.2d 144, 6991, Davis v. Ward

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 25 Cal.2d 287, 19046, Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California - 29 Cal.2d 87, 4714, People v. Koenig
California - 37 Cal.2d 465, 21416, Huffman v. Lindquist
California - 39 Cal.2d 12, 22263, Pfingsten v. Westenhaver
California - 41 Cal.2d 252, 5391, People v. Haeussler

See all quotations