217 Cal.App.3d 134, E005959, Carroll v. State of California

Citation: 217 Cal.App.3d 134, 265 Cal.Rptr. 753

Opinion Judge: [10] Dabney

Party Name: Carroll v. State of California

Attorney: [7] Fogel, Feldman, Ostrov, Ringler & Klevens, Jerome L. Ringler, Marvin Benson and Ronald J. Fomalont for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Joseph A. Montoya, Anthony J. Ruffolo, Robert W. Vidor, Larry R. Danielson, Faith I. Mitchell, Fidler & Bell and Paul J. Burkhart for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: January 17, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

217 Cal.App.3d 134, E005959, Carroll v. State of California

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 2 Cal.3d 557, 29704, Denham v. Superior Court
California - 38 Cal.3d 488, 31826, Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates
California - 47 Cal.3d 863, 32267, Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker
California - 230 Cal.App.2d 788, 10830, Critz v. Farmers Ins. Group
California - 94 Cal.App.2d 367, 16951, Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.

See all quotations