216 S.W.2d 222 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24195, Daugherty v. State

Citation: 216 S.W.2d 222, 153 Tex.Crim. 8

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: DAUGHERTY v. STATE.

Attorney: [153 Tex.Crim. 9] Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State. KRUEGER, Judge. No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Case Date: Wednesday December 08, 1948

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

216 S.W.2d 222 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24195, Daugherty v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 90 S.W. 34 (Tex.Crim.App. 1905), Jackson v. State
Texas - 165 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Crim.App. 1942), 22260, Ammann v. State
Texas - 216 S.W.2d 200 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24194, Daugherty v. State
Texas - 26 S.W.2d 206 (Tex.Crim.App. 1930), 13001, Basquez v. State
Texas - 58 S.W.2d 834 (Tex.Crim.App. 1933), 15586, Bailey v. State