216 Cal.App.3d 1010, G005327, In re Marriage of Carnall

Citation: 216 Cal.App.3d 1010, 265 Cal.Rptr. 271

Opinion Judge: [12] Moore

Party Name: In re Marriage of Carnall

Attorney: [7] De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, John P. Farrell and David L. Muir, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellant. [8] Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel (Orange), and Donald H. Rubin, Deputy County Counsel, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant. [9] Joseph A. Shuff III for Respondent Wife. [10] No app...

Case Date: Tuesday December 19, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

216 Cal.App.3d 1010, G005327, In re Marriage of Carnall

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 60 Cal.2d 355, 26786, Benson v. City of Los Angeles
California - 7 Cal.2d 565, 15466, Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco
California - 15 Cal.3d 838, 30463, In re Marriage of Brown
California - 45 Cal.3d 1, 25130, Walters v. Weed
California - 6 Cal.3d 461, 29905, Waite v. Waite

See all quotations