216 Cal.App.2d 778, 21266, Rothschild v. Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 216 Cal.App.2d 778, 31 Cal.Rptr. 248

Opinion Judge: [11] Draper

Party Name: Rothschild v. Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Julius A. Leetham for Petitioner. [8] No appearance for Respondent. [9] Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough and Gilbert Esenberg for Real Party in Interest.

Case Date: May 31, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

216 Cal.App.2d 778, 21266, Rothschild v. Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 179 Cal. 277, L. A. 4606, Security Inv. Co. v. Gifford
California - 50 Cal.2d 594, 24894, Peiser v. Mettler
California - 155 Cal.App.2d 660, 17433, Chaffin Constr. Co. v. Maleville Bros.
California - 175 Cal.App.2d 641, 23980, Flanagan v. Flanagan
California - 190 Cal.App.2d 440, 24945, Maxwell v. Murray

See all quotations