215 Cal.App.3d 1477, F011372, California Eye Institute v. Superior Court

Citation: 215 Cal.App.3d 1477, 264 Cal.Rptr. 83

Opinion Judge: [11] Ardaiz

Party Name: California Eye Institute v. Superior Court

Attorney: [6] McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Lawrence E. Wayte, David H. Bent and Matthew K. Hawkins for Petitioners. [7] Horvitz & Levy, David Axelrad and David Ettinger as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners. [8] No appearance for Respondent. [9] Charles O. Morgan, Jr., and Paul Kleven ...

Case Date: Wednesday November 22, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

215 Cal.App.3d 1477, F011372, California Eye Institute v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 19 Cal.2d 634, 18104, County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie
California - 10 Cal.3d 222, 22990, Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
California - 19 Cal.3d 152, 30403, Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo
California - 3 Cal.3d 118, 22724, Canales v. City of Alviso
California - 33 Cal.3d 699, 24385, Delta Farms Reclamation Dist. v. Superior Court

See all quotations