215 Cal.App.2d 231, 20824, Dauenhauer v. Sullivan

Citation: 215 Cal.App.2d 231, 30 Cal.Rptr. 71

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Dauenhauer v. Sullivan

Attorney: [7] Hitchcock & Coulter and L. G. Hitchcock for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Partridge, O'Connell, Partridge & Fall and George Brunn for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: April 18, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

215 Cal.App.2d 231, 20824, Dauenhauer v. Sullivan

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 212 Cal. 648, L. A. 10489, Slater v. Pacific American Oil Co.
California - 10 Cal.2d 519, 16409, Brown v. Regan
California - 35 Cal.2d 409, 21048, Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.
California - 50 Cal.App. 522, Civ. 3233, California Orange Co. v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.
California - 10 Cal.App.2d 547, 9932, Curtis v. San Pedro Transportation Co.

See all quotations