214 Cal.App.3d 266, B033645, Smith v. County of Los Angeles

Citation: 214 Cal.App.3d 266, 262 Cal.Rptr. 754

Opinion Judge: [10] George

Party Name: Smith v. County of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Fadem, Berger & Norton, Ann Kelly, Michael M. Berger and Richard D. Norton for Plaintiffs and Appellants and Plaintiffs and Respondents. [8] De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, John F. Krattli, Deputy County Counsel, Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott and James C. Powers for Defendant and Appe...

Case Date: Tuesday September 26, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

214 Cal.App.3d 266, B033645, Smith v. County of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 155 Cal. 21, S. F. 4798, Joaquin v. County of Stanislaus
California - 213 Cal. 554, Sac. 4379, Collier v. Merced Irr. Dist.
California - 25 Cal.2d 384, 18968, House v. L. A. County Flood Control Dist.
California - 3 Cal.2d 427, 15280, Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 30 Cal.2d 746, 19358, Heimann v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations