213 Cal.App.3d 596, F010595, Quesada v. Oak Hill Improvement Co.

Citation: 213 Cal.App.3d 596, 261 Cal.Rptr. 769

Opinion Judge: [10] Ardaiz

Party Name: Quesada v. Oak Hill Improvement Co.

Attorney: [7] James S. Feliciano and George L. Alonso, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Van Loucks & Hanley, Michael K. Budra, Geoffrey Van Loucks, Rankin, Oneal, Center, Luckhardt & Lund, Michael C. Serverian and Barbara J. Frischholz for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: August 28, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

213 Cal.App.3d 596, F010595, Quesada v. Oak Hill Improvement Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.2d 480, 17718, Chelini v. Nieri
California - 59 Cal.2d 295, S. F. 21152, Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.
California - 68 Cal.2d 728, 7816, Dillon v. Legg
California - 69 Cal.2d 108, 22583, Rowland v. Christian
California - 12 Cal.3d 382, 30271, Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

See all quotations