213 Cal.App.2d 400, 20198, Whoriskey v. City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 213 Cal.App.2d 400, 28 Cal.Rptr. 833

Opinion Judge: [10] Agee

Party Name: Whoriskey v. City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Husted, Pinney, Smith & Ogg, W. M. Pinney, Jr., and William R. Conklin for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Paul J. Di Noia, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: February 27, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

213 Cal.App.2d 400, 20198, Whoriskey v. City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 340 U.S. 474 (1951), 40, Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
California - 160 Cal. 197, S. F. 5758, Bannerman v. Boyle
California - 22 Cal.2d 226, 16768, Fernelius v. Pierce
California - 48 Cal.2d 15, 24364, Damiani v. Albert
California - 52 Cal.2d 238, 7040, Martin v. Alcoholic Bev. Etc. Appeals Bd.

See all quotations