213 Cal.App.2d 266, 10247, Baruh v. Kuhl

Citation: 213 Cal.App.2d 266, 28 Cal.Rptr. 573

Opinion Judge: [10] Pierce

Party Name: Baruh v. Kuhl

Attorney: [7] Hadsell, Murman & Bishop, Richard S. Bishop, Aldo P. Guidotti and Douglas G. Cowan for Defendant and Appellant. [8] P. M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein and Virgil O'Sullivan for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday February 20, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

213 Cal.App.2d 266, 10247, Baruh v. Kuhl

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 197 Cal. 694, S. F. 11731, Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co. of California
California - 16 Cal.2d 460, 16374, Showalter v. Western Pacific R. R. Co.
California - 3 Cal.2d 427, 15280, Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 130 Cal.App.2d 536, 8359, Yates v. Kuhl
California - 136 Cal.App.2d 99, 5403, People v. Channell

See all quotations