212 S.E.2d 925 (S.C. 1975), 19979, Smith v. Fitton & Pittman, Inc.

Citation: 212 S.E.2d 925, 264 S.C. 129

Opinion Judge: NESS, Justice:

Party Name: Nathaniel SMITH, Respondent, v. FITTON AND PITTMAN, INC., Appellant.

Attorney: Jeter E. Rhodes, Jr. Esq., of Whaley, McCutchen and Blanton, Columbia, for Appellant, cites: As to the evidence not establishing that the Defendant, Fitton & Pittman, Inc., was guilty of actionable negligence or a breach of any duty owing the Plaintiff: 250 S.C. 213, 157 S.E.2d 175; 57 Am. Jur. (...

Case Date: Wednesday March 26, 1975

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

212 S.E.2d 925 (S.C. 1975), 19979, Smith v. Fitton & Pittman, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 448 F.2d 238 (4th Cir. 1971), 15393, Gardner v. Q. H. S., Inc.
South Carolina - 104 S.E.2d 392 (S.C. 1958), 17445, Clyde v. Sumerel
South Carolina - 124 S.E.2d 321 (S.C. 1962), 17881, Matthews v. Porter
South Carolina - 161 S.E.2d 81 (S.C. 1968), 18778, Rogers v. Scyphers
South Carolina - 166 S.E.2d 173 (S.C. 1969), 18869, Mickle v. Blackmon

See all quotations