212 Cal.App.2d 778, 10479, Muther v. Muther

Citation: 212 Cal.App.2d 778, 28 Cal.Rptr. 200

Opinion Judge: [10] Van Dyke

Party Name: Muther v. Muther

Attorney: [7] Lally, Martin & Luce and Thomas W. Martin for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Albert M. King and Roger M. Settlemire for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday February 07, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

212 Cal.App.2d 778, 10479, Muther v. Muther

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 41 Cal.2d 648, 18788, McCracken v. Teets
California - 128 Cal.App.2d 128, 20065, Kenney v. Kenney
California - 150 Cal.App.2d 34, 8951, Hill v. Hill
California - 48 Cal.App.2d 762, 6645, Falk v. Falk