212 Cal.App.2d 67, 20710, Seckler v. Yamin

Citation: 212 Cal.App.2d 67, 27 Cal.Rptr. 711

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaufman

Party Name: Seckler v. Yamin

Attorney: [7] Lacey, Holbrook & Meyenberg and Richard E. Holbrook for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Morgan, Beauzay & Holmes and Robert Morgan for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: January 18, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

212 Cal.App.2d 67, 20710, Seckler v. Yamin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 44 Cal.2d 225, 23300, Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.
California - 57 Cal.2d 100, 26528, Kuntz v. Del E. Webb Const. Co.
California - 57 Cal.2d 407, 340, Woolen v. Aerojet General Corp.
California - 142 Cal.App.2d 575, 16740, Atherley v. Macdonald, Young & Nelson
California - 205 Cal.App.2d 522, 10304, Lokey v. Pine Mountain Lumber Co.