212 Cal.App.2d 494, 7029, Nece v. Bennett

Citation: 212 Cal.App.2d 494, 28 Cal.Rptr. 117

Opinion Judge: [10] Monroe

Party Name: Nece v. Bennett

Attorney: [7] Turner & McGraw and Preston Turner for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Lawton, Christensen, Rouse & Bergman and G. Merle Bergman for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday January 29, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

212 Cal.App.2d 494, 7029, Nece v. Bennett

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 142 Cal. 505, S. F. 3414, Savings Bank of Santa Rosa v. Schell
California - 27 Cal.2d 349, 19172, Herzog v. Capital Co.
California - 31 Cal.2d 744, 17392, Bagdasarian v. Gragnon
California - 19 Cal.App. 428, Civ. 1001, Bacon v. Soule
California - 101 Cal.App.2d 257, 17827, Milmoe v. Dixon

See all quotations