211 Cal.App.3d 40, B037836, Weissman v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn.

Citation: 211 Cal.App.3d 40, 259 Cal.Rptr. 124

Opinion Judge: [10] Goertzen

Party Name: Weissman v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn.

Attorney: [7] Lewis, Marenstein & Kadar and Thomas J. Wicke for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and David L. Muir, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

Case Date: May 22, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

211 Cal.App.3d 40, B037836, Weissman v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 46 Cal.2d 786, 19410, Wendland v. City of Alameda
California - 20 Cal.3d 25, 30398, Serrano v. Priest
California - 104 Cal.App.3d 323, 44096, Lucchesi v. City of San Jose
California - 127 Cal.App.3d 936, 24569, Dodosh v. County of Orange
California - 77 Cal.App.3d 1, 39059, Killian v. City and County of San Francisco

See all quotations