211 A.2d 700 (Conn. 1965), Williams v. State

Citation: 211 A.2d 700, 152 Conn. 692

Opinion Judge: MURPHY, J.

Party Name: Ruth WILLIAMS v. STATE of Connecticut.

Attorney: Edward B. Winnick, New Haven, with whom, on the brief, were Alexander Winnick, Arnold M. Potash and David W. Skolnick, New Haven, for appellant (plaintiff)., Louis Weinstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, were Harold M. Mulvey, Atty. Gen., and Stephen J. O'Neill, Asst. Atty. Gen., fo...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before KING, C J, and MURPHY, ALCORN, SHANNON, and HOUSE

Case Date: Tuesday June 22, 1965

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

211 A.2d 700 (Conn. 1965), Williams v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 150 A. 110 (Conn. 1930), Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.
Connecticut - 199 A.2d 695 (Conn. 1964), McKiernan v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 211 A.2d 691 (Conn. 1965), Staub v. Anderson
Connecticut - 23 A.2d 870 (Conn. 1942), Mulligan v. Oakes