210 Cal.App.3d 894, A041423, Brian T. v. Pacific Bell

Citation: 210 Cal.App.3d 894, 258 Cal.Rptr. 707

Opinion Judge: [10] Newsom

Party Name: Brian T. v. Pacific Bell

Attorney: [7] Bernard David Walter, James R. Trembath, Michael J. Veiluva, Arlene Segal, Trembath, McCabe, Schwartz, Evans & Levy and Benjamin W. Bull for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Margaret deB. Brown, Sarah J. Diehl, Steven B. Rathfon, Robert N. Harris, Gonzalez & Harris, John L. Williams, Manchester...

Case Date: Monday May 22, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

210 Cal.App.3d 894, A041423, Brian T. v. Pacific Bell

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Code of Federal Regulations - Restrictions on indecent telephone message services
US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 223 Obscene Or Harassing Telephone Calls In the District of Columbia Or In Interstate Or Foreign Communications
California - People v. Toomey
Federal Cases - Fort Wayne Books, Inc v. Indiana Sappenfield v. Indiana
California - Brian T. v. Pacific Bell

See all quotations