210 Cal.App.2d 843, 20532, Filice v. Boccardo

Citation: 210 Cal.App.2d 843, 26 Cal.Rptr. 789

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Filice v. Boccardo

Attorney: [7] Frank H. Filice, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Leslie L. Roos, Morgan, Beauzay & Holmes and Robert Morgan for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Monday December 17, 1962

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

210 Cal.App.2d 843, 20532, Filice v. Boccardo

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 16 Cal.2d 423, 5243, Bainbridge v. Stoner
California - 44 Cal.2d 90, 23083, Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. Public Works
California - 103 Cal.App.2d 29, 18247, Douglas v. Douglas
California - 137 Cal.App.2d 651, 5202, Phillips v. Phillips
California - 172 Cal.App.2d 756, 22828, Agnew v. Parks

See all quotations