210 Cal.App.2d 405, 141, Bettencourt v. Direct Transp. Co.

Citation: 210 Cal.App.2d 405, 26 Cal.Rptr. 623

Opinion Judge: [10] Stone

Party Name: Bettencourt v. Direct Transp. Co.

Attorney: [7] McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard & Coyle and Hollis G. Best, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Peckinpah, Fryer & Karr, Walkup & Downing, Stutsman, Nagel & Ferrari and Denver C. Peckinpah for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: November 30, 1962

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

210 Cal.App.2d 405, 141, Bettencourt v. Direct Transp. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.2d 729, 19552, Brandelius v. City & County of S. F.
California - 50 Cal.2d 153, 24748, Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California - 55 Cal.2d 573, 20188, Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.
California - 140 Cal.App.2d 881, 4994, Cucuk v. Payne
California - 146 Cal.App.2d 504, 21749, Odell v. Frueh

See all quotations