21 Cal.App.3d 551, 27991, Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill

Citation: 21 Cal.App.3d 551, 98 Cal.Rptr. 576

Opinion Judge: [12] Taylor

Party Name: Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill

Attorney: [7] James C. Purcell for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Edward M. Kovach and Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson for Intervener and Appellant. [9] Thomas M. O'Conner, City Attorney, and Edmund A. Bacigalupi, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents. [10] Charles H. Blagburn for Intervene...

Case Date: Friday November 26, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

21 Cal.App.3d 551, 27991, Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 210 Cal. 504, S. F. 13900, San Diego and Coronado Ferry Co. v. Railroad Commission of the State of California
California - 23 Cal.2d 303, 16947, Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals
California - 30 Cal.2d 832, 19641, Hartford Acc. Etc. Co. v. City of Tulare
California - 51 Cal.2d 177, 6215, In re Petersen
California - 53 Cal.2d 236, 20333, City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco

See all quotations