209 N.W. 632 (Minn. 1926), 25,225, In re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Grading, Paving And Improving of Robert

Citation: 209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: IN RE ASSESSMENT OF BENEFITS FROM CHANGING GRADE, GRADING, PAVING AND IMPROVING OF ROBERT AND OTHER STREETS

Attorney: Thomas C. Fitzpatrick, William F. Hunt, William B. Douglas, Edward B. Young, Paul D. Schriber, James Schoonmaker, Paul Bremer, W. W. Cutler, F. H. Ewing, Lightner & Young, W. B. Douglas, and Douglas, Kennedy & Kennedy, for appellants. Arthur A. Stewart, for respondent.

Case Date: June 11, 1926

Court: Minnesota Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

209 N.W. 632 (Minn. 1926), 25,225, In re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Grading, Paving And Improving of Robert

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Minnesota - 204 N.W. 558 (Minn. 1925), 24,702, In re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving And Improving Robert And Other Streets, St. Paul
Minnesota - 209 N.W. 632 (Minn. 1926), 25,396, Schlesinger v. Erickson