209 Cal.App.3d 1528, B036645, Austin v. Board of Retirement

Citation: 209 Cal.App.3d 1528, 258 Cal.Rptr. 106

Opinion Judge: [10] Danielson

Party Name: Austin v. Board of Retirement

Attorney: [7] De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Bruce M. Hale, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Lewis, Marenstein & Kadar and Thomas J. Wicke for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: May 02, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

209 Cal.App.3d 1528, B036645, Austin v. Board of Retirement

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 26 Cal.2d 453, 16970, Estate of Madison
California - 61 Cal.2d 612, 21690, Mass v. Board of Ed. of San Francisco Unified School Dist.
California - 17 Cal.3d 671, 23423, Tripp v. Swoap
California - 32 Cal.3d 128, 31533, Baggett v. Gates
California - 35 Cal.3d 390, 31780, Olson v. Cory

See all quotations