208 Cal.App.3d 972, B032783, Newman v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Citation: 208 Cal.App.3d 972, 256 Cal.Rptr. 503

Opinion Judge: [10] Goertzen

Party Name: Newman v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Attorney: [7] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer and Richard E. Nielsen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Russell J. Frackman and Mitchell M. Gaswirth for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: March 16, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

208 Cal.App.3d 972, B032783, Newman v. Franchise Tax Bd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 690 F.2d 40 (2nd Cir. 1982), 1206, Stemkowski v. C. I. R.
Federal Cases - 163 F.Supp. 614 (Ct.Cl. 1958), 391-55, Newton v. United States
California - 275 Cal.App.2d 653, 11755, Andrews v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California - 118 Cal.App.3d 951, 20006, McKinney v. Kull
California - 48 Cal.App.3d 890, 42844, Oliver & Williams Elevator Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization